Kuala Lumpur & Johor·Construction disputes since 2014
Plan your timeline
Extension-of-time, prolongation, disruption and loss-and-expense claims — built on rigorous programme analysis that survives cross-examination.
Practice 03

Delay, disruption & extension-of-time claims

Delay claims are where projects most often come apart. Who caused the delay, whether the events were concurrent, what an extension of time is really worth in prolongation cost — these are technical questions before they are legal ones. We build delay and disruption claims that hold up under scrutiny.

Extension of time and concurrent delay

An entitlement to an extension of time depends on the cause of the delay and the mechanism in the contract. Where employer risk events and contractor risk events overlap — concurrent delay — the analysis becomes contentious and the case law is unsettled. We approach it methodically, with a delay methodology suited to the records that actually exist on the project.

Disruption and loss and expense

Disruption — loss of productivity from out-of-sequence or interrupted working — is distinct from delay and is often under-claimed because it is harder to prove. We work with quantum experts to substantiate loss-and-expense and prolongation claims with measured-mile and other accepted techniques, rather than global claims that tribunals distrust.

Programme evidence

The strength of a delay claim lives in the contemporaneous programme and progress records. We help clients preserve and organise that evidence during the project, not just when the dispute crystallises, so the analysis rests on fact rather than reconstruction.

Model the LAD exposure

See how extensions of time change the liquidated-damages figure.

Open the LAD Calculator

How we help

  • Extension-of-time claims and assessments
  • Prolongation and loss-and-expense claims
  • Disruption and loss-of-productivity claims
  • Concurrent delay analysis
  • Instructing and working with delay and quantum experts
  • Defending delay claims and levying liquidated ascertained damages

Common questions

What is the difference between delay and disruption?
Delay pushes back the completion date; disruption reduces productivity without necessarily delaying completion, so labour and plant cost more than they should to achieve the same work. They are proved differently and claimed separately, and treating one as the other weakens both.
How is an extension of time linked to LAD?
An extension of time moves the contractual completion date, which reduces the period of culpable delay against which liquidated ascertained damages can be levied. Getting the extension right is often the most effective defence to an LAD deduction. Our LAD & Delay-Damages Calculator lets you model the exposure at different net delay figures.
Speak to counsel

A payment claim just landed? The clock has already started.

Construction disputes run on deadlines — statutory and contractual. Tell us where you are and we will tell you, plainly, what your position is and what the next working days require. The first conversation is complimentary.

Call Timeline Enquire
Teoh Danaraj & Partners is a design mockup created by Seed Light to demonstrate what a modern legal website can look like. The business, people, prices and contact details above are fictional; any resemblance to real firms or persons is coincidental. Like what you see? WhatsApp Seed Light about a website for your business.

Demo mockup

Like this website?

Teoh Danaraj & Partners is a fictional legal demo built by Seed Light. We design and build websites like this for real Malaysian businesses.

WhatsApp Seed Lightseed-light.com